You must now subscribe to Creative Cloud to get Lightroom 7, or whatever it is now called by Adobe. Now I see that Adobe have just announced the end of Lightroom as a standalone product – Lightroom 6 will not be followed by a Lightroom 7 for purchase. It made no sense to leave one Adobe module (PS) only to start up with another Adobe product in Lightroom. However, despite these attractions, I decided against the idea. As Lightroom incorporated Adobe Camera RAW, with which I was already familiar, this seemed an attractive option since Apple had stopped developing Aperture and Lightroom had already drawn well ahead of it in features and capability. LightroomĪt the same time, I had trialled Lightroom for a month since I was looking to replace Apple’s Aperture which I had been using not for RAW conversion but as an asset manager. I can confirm satisfactory experience using it for development of both Canon and Nikon RAW files. Many of the good points he makes in relation to Affinity Photo and Fuji RAW files are also applicable to using it with other brands of RAW. For a professional photographer’s take on Affinity photo with Fuji RAW files in particular, I suggest a visit to Thomas Fitzgerald Photography. It is indeed very good but I have found that AP is also very good and much more intuitive to use. Iridient had very good reviews for the development of Fuji RAW files. I also purchased Iridient Developer as a back up RAW developer in case AP was unsatisfactory. From that time too I managed my images by using folders on my computer labelled by year, date, location and shoot, all backed up via Time Machine. For those with some reasonable knowledge of PS, transition to AP is straightforward. My way forward came with the purchase of Affinity Photo and some time spent learning how to use it and then to do virtually all the things that I used to do in Photoshop. Thirdly, although one could always store PSD layered files away from Adobe’s cloud, one might be faced with being unable to re-work such old PS files because of future inability to access an appropriate version of PS itself. Second, if at some stage into my retirement I needed to retrench financially, what would happen if I stopped paying my subscription to Adobe? I would lose access to Photoshop because keeping PS6 going on an old computer would be no long-term answer, since Adobe would undoubtedly no longer bother to ensure PS6 compatibility with frequent Mac OS upgrades. Guarding Goslings, Fuji X-T2 and 100-400mm Reasonsįirst, I prefer to own software outright rather than take on yet another monthly financial commitment. I also took the decision at that point to save no more layered files in PSD format until I had found a way forward. They have not put the needs of ordinary enthusiast photographers, nor even those of some professionals, high on the list of their prioritiesĪccordingly, I decided to sign up for one year of Adobe’s Creative Cloud but determined that I would immediately start a hunt for a PS replacement. This episode on its own was enough to demonstrate to me that Adobe are primarily focused on design professionals in a corporate environment. This meant that continued use of PS on a temporary basis was possible but left the fundamental questions around the acceptability of the new system unanswered for many photographers including me. Photographers all over the world, including myself, pointed out that many Adobe products are not used at all by many photographers so why should we pay for them? After initial denial that an issue existed, Adobe eventually introduced the photographic bundle of Photoshop and Lightroom for under £10 a month. It was also claimed that customers would have access to the whole range of Adobe products within their Creative Cloud subscription. The advantage, they claimed, was that customers would always have access to the latest features via rolling updates. Then Adobe announced that purchase of PS outright was to end and that they were introducing a new subscription pricing model. I used Adobe Camera RAW to “develop” my RAW files before editing in PS. Like so many others, I considered the end results well worth the effort required. It took me several years to learn how to use the features of Photoshop (PS) well enough for effective image editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |